1
00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:01,791
This is a Peltier element.

2
00:00:02,291 --> 00:00:05,427
It may look&nbsp;like a rather unassuming hunk of material,

3
00:00:05,427 --> 00:00:13,310
but sandwiched between these two plates are&nbsp;a whole bunch of semiconductor junctions that have been carefully arranged to do something remarkable:

4
00:00:13,310 --> 00:00:19,401
when I apply a DC voltage across these two wires, the plate becomes cold.

5
00:00:19,401 --> 00:00:24,342
This is&nbsp;called thermoelectric cooling,
and it’s happening thanks to the Peltier&nbsp;effect.

6
00:00:24,342 --> 00:00:30,194
With advances in manufacturing,
we are now able to produce these devices quickly&nbsp;and cheaply.

7
00:00:30,194 --> 00:00:33,317
These ones here cost less than $3 each.

8
00:00:33,317 --> 00:00:37,956
There’s just one little issue with this&nbsp;technology:

9
00:00:37,956 --> 00:00:40,090
it’s not very good.

10
00:00:40,090 --> 00:00:42,129
Like, at all.

11
00:00:42,129 --> 00:00:44,248
OK, we’re gonna need some context.

12
00:00:44,248 --> 00:00:46,611
I’m making this video for a couple of reasons:

13
00:00:46,611 --> 00:00:51,143
First, you may know about my one true love, the&nbsp;refrigeration cycle.

14
00:00:51,143 --> 00:00:56,339
I adore a good heat pump and could talk your ear off about them&nbsp;for hours on end,

15
00:00:56,339 --> 00:01:01,775
but vapor-compression based refrigeration systems are
bulky and mechanically&nbsp;complex affairs.

16
00:01:01,775 --> 00:01:06,137
They also have some environmental issues stemming from the refrigerants&nbsp;they use.

17
00:01:06,137 --> 00:01:10,697
Because of those downsides, with a regularity you could practically set a&nbsp;watch to

18
00:01:10,697 --> 00:01:16,423
well-meaning people discover Peltier elements
and question why we don’t use these&nbsp;instead.

19
00:01:16,423 --> 00:01:23,231
A device with no moving parts and which makes cooling happen simply by putting&nbsp;voltage across it does feel like the future!

20
00:01:23,231 --> 00:01:27,125
That’s gotta be better than all the faff&nbsp;
we go through to build a fridge, right?

21
00:01:27,125 --> 00:01:29,991
Well, “better” is a slippery word.

22
00:01:29,991 --> 00:01:41,774
For one&nbsp;thing, the Peltier these are named for is Jean Charles Athanase Peltier,
and he discovered this&nbsp;phenomenon back in 1834.

23
00:01:41,774 --> 00:01:47,492
We’ve been taking cracks at this for a long time, yet it still hasn’t&nbsp;changed the world.

24
00:01:47,492 --> 00:01:52,041
It is true that this form of cooling offers some unique advantages

25
00:01:52,041 --> 00:02:00,221
and in very&nbsp;specific applications with equally specific design constraints,
using a Peltier element can make some&nbsp;sense.

26
00:02:00,221 --> 00:02:07,140
However, the situations in which these are truly appropriate to use are very, very rare.

27
00:02:07,140 --> 00:02:14,327
You&nbsp;will absolutely understand why that is by the end, but for now
(and this leads into the second&nbsp;reason I’m making this video)

28
00:02:14,327 --> 00:02:19,093
you should know that the majority of products on sale&nbsp;
today which use these things

29
00:02:19,093 --> 00:02:25,434
are being made purely to capitalize on the fact that we just&nbsp;
can’t stop ourselves from buying cheap crap.

30
00:02:25,434 --> 00:02:30,256
Speaking of cheap crap,
you’ve probably seen&nbsp;these little personal refrigerators before.

31
00:02:30,256 --> 00:02:35,946
The idea is you can keep a few cans of your favorite&nbsp;
beverage cool on your desk!

32
00:02:35,946 --> 00:02:38,760
You’ll be the talk of the office, for sure!

33
00:02:38,760 --> 00:02:44,393
All of these things use&nbsp;Peltier elements to cool their insides for a very simple reason:

34
00:02:44,393 --> 00:02:45,566
cost.

35
00:02:45,566 --> 00:02:49,462
These have to be cheap&nbsp;enough for people to pick them up impulsively.

36
00:02:49,462 --> 00:02:53,296
And they are - this was priced just over $30.

37
00:02:53,296 --> 00:03:01,243
You can’t build a proper fridge that cheaply, but you can build a little plastic box
with a&nbsp;cheap power supply and $2 Peltier module in it.

38
00:03:01,243 --> 00:03:03,339
And people will buy it.

39
00:03:03,339 --> 00:03:05,786
Look, I’m a people, and I&nbsp;bought it!

40
00:03:05,786 --> 00:03:07,604
But is it any good?

41
00:03:07,604 --> 00:03:08,963
Spoiler alert:

42
00:03:08,963 --> 00:03:10,279
No!

43
00:03:10,279 --> 00:03:12,973
Let’s turn it on and put it through its&nbsp;paces!

44
00:03:12,973 --> 00:03:16,575
It has a power switch helpfully labeled “Off” and “Cold.”

45
00:03:16,575 --> 00:03:18,756
That's a sign of&nbsp;quality, that is.

46
00:03:18,756 --> 00:03:20,235
Here goes nothing!

47
00:03:20,235 --> 00:03:23,934
[a fan spins up]
Ooh, it’s even got an interior light! How thoughtful.

48
00:03:23,934 --> 00:03:28,521
But, uh, that’s a lot of noise for something with no moving parts.

49
00:03:28,521 --> 00:03:30,407
What gives?

50
00:03:30,407 --> 00:03:38,484
Well, the Peltier&nbsp;element itself doesn’t have any moving parts 
but when I showed you it in the beginning, I only&nbsp;showed one side of it.

51
00:03:38,484 --> 00:03:46,355
That side was getting cold, yes, and in this... alleged fridge
the cold side of&nbsp;the element is bonded to the rear wall

52
00:03:46,355 --> 00:03:49,776
which we can see getting cold in the thermal camera.

53
00:03:49,776 --> 00:03:57,542
But&nbsp;as the peltier element generates cooling on the one side,
the other side of the element&nbsp;gets hot.

54
00:03:57,542 --> 00:03:59,582
Very hot.

55
00:03:59,582 --> 00:04:01,954
Problematically hot.

56
00:04:01,954 --> 00:04:04,992
Why? Well, two reasons.

57
00:04:04,992 --> 00:04:13,139
Peltier modules produce&nbsp;cooling by absorbing heat on the cold side
and moving it through the element to the hot side.

58
00:04:13,139 --> 00:04:19,691
That’s how all cooling works - energy doesn’t just disappear,
so to lower the amount of heat&nbsp;energy in one location,

59
00:04:19,691 --> 00:04:23,957
you have to absorb it from that location and move it somewhere else.

60
00:04:23,957 --> 00:04:26,050
Which is exactly what these do.

61
00:04:26,050 --> 00:04:32,700
They absorb heat on this side (which to us feels like coldness)
and&nbsp;reject it on the hot side.

62
00:04:32,700 --> 00:04:40,723
But since the heat is only moving across
a thin little barrier with&nbsp;very little mass, it builds up really quickly.

63
00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:42,164
But that’s not all!

64
00:04:42,164 --> 00:04:45,781
The element itself creates&nbsp;heat as it runs.

65
00:04:45,781 --> 00:04:55,518
These here are rated 5 amps at 12 volts, so when running at full capacity
they’re dissipating 60&nbsp;watts of heat in a really small space,

66
00:04:55,518 --> 00:04:59,710
and that’s on top of the heat it’s pulling from the cold&nbsp;side.

67
00:04:59,710 --> 00:05:06,775
So, to keep it from destroying itself, you need a finned heat sink 
bonded to&nbsp;the hot side to spread that heat out,

68
00:05:06,775 --> 00:05:12,721
and you’ll also need a fan to force air across the&nbsp;
heat sink to spread the heat even more quicklier.

69
00:05:12,721 --> 00:05:20,639
And as we can see here, the itty bitty fridge&nbsp;
has a generously sized heat sink hanging off the back with a fan blowing right at it.

70
00:05:20,639 --> 00:05:30,080
A fan and&nbsp;heat sink pair isn’t complicated or expensive,
but it means this is noisier than you might&nbsp;expect and, ya know, adds a moving part.

71
00:05:30,080 --> 00:05:33,979
But noise is forgivable, the real question is&nbsp;how well does it work?

72
00:05:33,979 --> 00:05:37,209
And the answer to that question is: not!

73
00:05:37,209 --> 00:05:41,420
And by every conceivable&nbsp;metric you can imagine.

74
00:05:41,420 --> 00:05:45,212
For a start, you may have noticed this has no temperature&nbsp;settings.

75
00:05:45,212 --> 00:05:47,698
It’s just cold or off.

76
00:05:47,698 --> 00:05:55,390
That’s because it only promises to lower the internal temperature
by up to 30 degrees below ambient temperature.

77
00:05:55,390 --> 00:05:57,122
That’s it.

78
00:05:57,122 --> 00:06:03,157
I appreciate its honesty, but if you&nbsp;know anything about food safety,
you’re gonna be getting the willies right now.

79
00:06:03,157 --> 00:06:09,600
Because in an&nbsp;office environment during the summertime where, say, the room temperature might be 75 degrees&nbsp;Fahrenheit,

80
00:06:09,600 --> 00:06:18,774
this thing will - at best - get the interior down to 45 degrees Fahrenheit which by&nbsp;US standards is not food safe.

81
00:06:18,774 --> 00:06:20,881
So… strike one.

82
00:06:20,881 --> 00:06:25,657
But ok, let’s say you just want to cool some&nbsp;
beverages and you don’t care about food.

83
00:06:25,657 --> 00:06:31,157
Well, to see how well it manages that
I loaded it up&nbsp;fully with 6 room temperature beverage cans

84
00:06:31,157 --> 00:06:35,624
then shoved one of my temperature data loggers in the&nbsp;void space between them.

85
00:06:35,624 --> 00:06:41,207
After running for two hours, it hadn’t even gotten below 60 degrees&nbsp;inside here.

86
00:06:41,207 --> 00:06:45,588
After 12 hours it had only managed to drop to 48 degrees Fahrenheit,

87
00:06:45,588 --> 00:06:51,413
and after 24&nbsp;hours the temperature had plateaued at about 46 degrees.

88
00:06:51,413 --> 00:06:53,924
Not very impressive.

89
00:06:53,924 --> 00:06:57,654
Somehow it got a&nbsp;bit of a second wind right near the 24 hour mark,

90
00:06:57,654 --> 00:07:01,626
which I believe happened just because the room it&nbsp;
was in had cooled off a little,

91
00:07:01,626 --> 00:07:04,962
and we ended up bottoming out at 45.5 degrees.

92
00:07:04,962 --> 00:07:09,492
Which, in fairness, was&nbsp;about 30 degrees below the room temperature.

93
00:07:09,492 --> 00:07:14,494
So it did what it said it would, but it sure took&nbsp;ages to get there.

94
00:07:14,494 --> 00:07:22,113
However, I was measuring the air temperature in the center of the fridge and&nbsp;since the cans are all touching the sides,

95
00:07:22,113 --> 00:07:28,991
I found that the actual temperature of the liquid in those&nbsp;
cans was a slightly warmer 50 degrees.

96
00:07:28,991 --> 00:07:32,663
Chilled, I suppose, but I wouldn’t want a&nbsp;beer that warm.

97
00:07:33,000 --> 00:07:35,578
So… strike two.

98
00:07:35,578 --> 00:07:38,377
But okay, so it’s not technically a refrigerator

99
00:07:38,377 --> 00:07:39,680
and it takes forever to cool down

100
00:07:39,680 --> 00:07:41,371
and it doesn’t keep things that cold

101
00:07:41,371 --> 00:07:43,507
and it’s louder than the box&nbsp;implies

102
00:07:43,507 --> 00:07:45,927
but that doesn’t mean it’s not useful!

103
00:07:45,927 --> 00:07:49,758
And to that I’d say, you’re not technically wrong!

104
00:07:49,758 --> 00:07:56,919
Some people use these things to keep certain cosmetic items in a cool, dry place, 
and from&nbsp;what I can tell they’re happy to have these!

105
00:07:56,919 --> 00:08:02,784
And if 50 degrees is cold enough for you, and you’re&nbsp;
diligent about rotating cans in and out,

106
00:08:02,784 --> 00:08:06,611
you might actually enjoy this as a beverage cooler.

107
00:08:06,611 --> 00:08:09,835
But&nbsp;here comes strike three, and it’s a doozy

108
00:08:09,835 --> 00:08:13,649
(and also why Peltier devices are generally terrible).

109
00:08:13,649 --> 00:08:20,000
If you’re at all concerned with how much energy
this thing will use to do its job not very well,

110
00:08:20,000 --> 00:08:26,941
you should know that this thing consumes about 55 watts of power all the time.

111
00:08:26,941 --> 00:08:32,978
That’s not a ton&nbsp;of power, no, but guess what uses less power than that?

112
00:08:32,978 --> 00:08:36,598
Well, lots of things but most relevant&nbsp;to this discussion -

113
00:08:36,598 --> 00:08:39,433
an actual refrigerator.

114
00:08:39,433 --> 00:08:45,391
This here is what I call the standard cube&nbsp;fridge,
the most basic mini-fridge you can buy.

115
00:08:45,391 --> 00:08:52,751
They’re generally around $100 and&nbsp;while they are incredibly basic they are also actual refrigerators.

116
00:08:52,751 --> 00:08:59,283
We have a lil’&nbsp;baby compressor back here pumping refrigerant 
through an honest-to-goodness refrigeration&nbsp;circuit.

117
00:08:59,283 --> 00:09:04,970
Now, it did cost significantly more money to purchase than the blue... thing,

118
00:09:04,970 --> 00:09:08,044
but it&nbsp;can also hold a lot more stuff.

119
00:09:08,044 --> 00:09:10,700
Including the blue fridge.

120
00:09:10,700 --> 00:09:16,224
By the internationally recognized&nbsp;metric of
“how many cans of La Croix can you shove in there per dollar”

121
00:09:16,224 --> 00:09:18,800
the real fridge&nbsp;wins by a lot.

122
00:09:18,800 --> 00:09:27,283
It’ll hold 33 cans easily, and 36 if you’re a little bit creative,&nbsp;
which works out to $2.77 per can.

123
00:09:27,283 --> 00:09:35,080
And the blue fridge, despite only costing $30,&nbsp;
only holds six cans so that’s $5 per can.

124
00:09:35,080 --> 00:09:36,727
But that’s not the real issue.

125
00:09:36,727 --> 00:09:41,735
Remember,&nbsp;the blue fridge uses 55 watts all the time.

126
00:09:41,735 --> 00:09:44,031
Guess how much power this thing uses?

127
00:09:44,031 --> 00:09:50,295
Once&nbsp;the refrigeration circuit has stabilized,
it pulls between 45 and 50 watts from the wall.

128
00:09:50,295 --> 00:09:58,618
I’ve consulted with some math scholars who have confirmed for me
that that figure is less than&nbsp;the 55 watts the stupid blue fridge pulls.

129
00:09:58,618 --> 00:10:00,192
But that’s not all!

130
00:10:00,192 --> 00:10:07,549
This, because it’s an actual&nbsp;refrigerator,
has a thermostat to maintain food safe temperatures inside!

131
00:10:07,549 --> 00:10:10,791
And that means it doesn’t&nbsp;run all the time.

132
00:10:10,791 --> 00:10:17,831
I monitored its energy use when loaded up with 15 already-chilled beverage&nbsp;cans,
and to keep them cool over three hours,

133
00:10:17,831 --> 00:10:24,706
it consumed just 65 watt-hours representing an&nbsp;average draw of 21.7 watts.

134
00:10:24,706 --> 00:10:30,000
And, by the way, the room it was in during that&nbsp;test was a pretty warm 78 degrees.

135
00:10:30,000 --> 00:10:32,267
Now, electricity isn’t free.

136
00:10:32,267 --> 00:10:35,075
So let’s do&nbsp;a little cost comparison.

137
00:10:35,075 --> 00:10:43,007
The blue fridge, with its constant 55 watt draw,
will consume&nbsp;39.6 kilowatt-hours per month.

138
00:10:43,007 --> 00:10:52,228
Going by the average cost of electricity in the US of $0.14&nbsp;per kilowatt-hour,
it will cost about $5.50 per month to use continuously.

139
00:10:52,228 --> 00:10:55,611
So about&nbsp;$66 a year.

140
00:10:55,611 --> 00:11:04,561
The much larger mini fridge, on the other hand,
drawing 22 watts continuously&nbsp;will consume 15.8 kilowatt-hours in a month,

141
00:11:04,561 --> 00:11:10,176
which costs $2.21 per month, or $27 bucks a year.

142
00:11:10,176 --> 00:11:13,589
That’s $39 less than the blue fridge per year,

143
00:11:13,589 --> 00:11:20,805
so it doesn’t even take two years of&nbsp;operation
for the extra $70 you spend on the real fridge to pay for itself.

144
00:11:21,423 --> 00:11:24,488
Seems&nbsp;like this blue fridge might be kind of bad!

145
00:11:24,488 --> 00:11:31,501
Now I could stop here, but I’m not gonna
because&nbsp;this thing's awful efficiency just gets funnier the more context you have.

146
00:11:31,501 --> 00:11:33,488
You remember this goofy thing.

147
00:11:33,488 --> 00:11:39,307
It’s moved into my office and has an actual
temperature controller now which fixes its major&nbsp;flaw.

148
00:11:39,307 --> 00:11:48,590
It’s still by no means a good refrigerator - stick a twelve pack
of room temperature cans&nbsp;in there and it runs nonstop for almost four hours.

149
00:11:48,590 --> 00:11:51,559
It’s really not built for making warm&nbsp;things cold.

150
00:11:51,559 --> 00:11:57,258
But as far as its ability to maintain food safe temperatures, it does the job&nbsp;just fine.

151
00:11:57,258 --> 00:11:59,708
And how much energy does it use?

152
00:11:59,708 --> 00:12:08,789
Well, after adding 6 room temperature beverage cans,
I measured&nbsp;its energy use over 24 hours and it needed only 970 watt-hours,

153
00:12:08,789 --> 00:12:12,557
meaning on average it only pulled&nbsp;40.4 watts.

154
00:12:12,557 --> 00:12:16,778
Which, believe it or not, is less than 55.

155
00:12:16,778 --> 00:12:21,997
And that’s despite the rather pronounced
size difference between these two machines.

156
00:12:21,997 --> 00:12:23,928
I mean… just look at them!

157
00:12:23,928 --> 00:12:33,017
It’s frankly ridiculous&nbsp;that such a tiny little “fridge” is using more energy than the comparatively gigantic one&nbsp;next to it.

158
00:12:33,017 --> 00:12:36,492
In an earlier 24 hour test when the weather was a little cooler,

159
00:12:36,492 --> 00:12:47,673
the red fridge&nbsp;consumed just 890 watt-hours in 24 hours
while the stupid little blue one needed 1,290 watt hours&nbsp;over the same period.

160
00:12:47,673 --> 00:12:53,218
Because it’s always pulling 55 watts whenever it’s switched on.

161
00:12:53,218 --> 00:12:59,481
That’s 45% more&nbsp;energy spent only kind of cooling six cans.

162
00:12:59,481 --> 00:13:02,335
And ya know how many cans this sucker will&nbsp;hold?

163
00:13:02,335 --> 00:13:10,532
If you fill the crisper drawer, all the door shelves,
and double stack on the top shelf,&nbsp;it’ll hold 135 cans.

164
00:13:10,532 --> 00:13:19,816
It’ll take it forever to make them all cold but once they get there the fridge&nbsp;will use roughly the same 900 watt-hours per day keeping them all ice cold.

165
00:13:19,816 --> 00:13:23,547
Are you starting to&nbsp;understand why I keep calling this stupid junk?

166
00:13:23,547 --> 00:13:28,690
And let’s not forget the red fridge has a freezer&nbsp;compartment
for ice cream and pizza and stuff!

167
00:13:28,690 --> 00:13:36,748
Now, as I’ve covered before, mini-fridges&nbsp;are actually some of the 
least energy-efficient refrigerators out there thanks to their&nbsp;minimal insulation.

168
00:13:37,572 --> 00:13:43,253
And by the way, I need to clear something up for the&nbsp;
Europeans who keep badgering me about this:

169
00:13:43,320 --> 00:13:46,467
I never said the red fridge was a mini-fridge!

170
00:13:46,467 --> 00:13:53,435
A bunch of you heard me say that somewhere
but I would never consider a fridge which goes up to&nbsp;my chest to be a mini-fridge.

171
00:13:53,435 --> 00:13:59,542
I called it little, and I called it a bit on the small side
but I also said, and I quote,

172
00:13:59,542 --> 00:14:06,095
“it’s much bigger than a typical mini-fridge
and served me well as a&nbsp;decently competent refrigerator.”

173
00:14:06,095 --> 00:14:13,680
At the very end of that video I did lump it into the category&nbsp;
of mini-fridges because of its thin walls,&nbsp;&nbsp;

174
00:14:13,680 --> 00:14:17,811
but that’s as close as I ever got to calling it&nbsp;a mini-fridge.

175
00:14:17,811 --> 00:14:22,151
Methinks your confirmation bias kicked in a little early and a little strong.

176
00:14:22,151 --> 00:14:25,085
Maybe those 230 volts are gettin’ to your head.

177
00:14:25,085 --> 00:14:28,100
But speaking of Americans and their giant&nbsp;American fridges,

178
00:14:28,100 --> 00:14:31,896
[banjo music starts]
at home I’ve got a GIANT AMERICAN FRIDGE!

179
00:14:31,896 --> 00:14:36,686
[said in a thick Southern accent]
My 360 pound behemoth (that’s&nbsp;163 kilograms for you commies)

180
00:14:36,686 --> 00:14:39,942
features automatic defrost for maintenance-free operation,

181
00:14:39,942 --> 00:14:45,798
is plumbed to a water line for its built-in ice maker
because we want ice in our drinks,&nbsp;goshdarnit,

182
00:14:45,798 --> 00:14:53,813
and it has 16.35 All-American Cubic Feet of Fridge Capacity
and a 5.59 cubic foot&nbsp;freezer compartment.

183
00:14:53,813 --> 00:14:59,604
That’s 461 liters in the fridge and 158 litres in the freezer.

184
00:14:59,604 --> 00:15:03,376
And guess&nbsp;which of those two fridges uses more energy?

185
00:15:03,376 --> 00:15:05,795
THIS STUPID THING!

186
00:15:05,795 --> 00:15:12,468
Yes, according to government testing (I didn’t&nbsp;do my own, sorry about that)
my bottom-freezer, French door fridge

187
00:15:12,468 --> 00:15:15,405
(which are two&nbsp;dings against its energy efficiency),

188
00:15:15,405 --> 00:15:21,589
despite being able to hold over 50 times as&nbsp;
much stuff before we even count the frozen food,

189
00:15:21,589 --> 00:15:30,115
and which features heated defrost uses slightly&nbsp;
less energy over a year than it takes to run this toy.

190
00:15:30,115 --> 00:15:39,643
It needs 1,270 watt-hours per day to&nbsp;attain actual refrigeration
compared to the 1,290 this stupid thing used

191
00:15:39,643 --> 00:15:43,743
to keep six cans&nbsp;of la croix only kind of chilled.

192
00:15:43,743 --> 00:15:48,302
I ask again, are you starting to understand why I&nbsp;think these things are stupid junk?

193
00:15:48,302 --> 00:15:53,236
Side note, I used the Canadian energy stats&nbsp;because as I found out the last go-round,

194
00:15:53,236 --> 00:15:58,920
the American EnergyGuide label is very very&nbsp;
pessimistic thanks to the way the tests are run.

195
00:15:59,680 --> 00:16:04,320
It includes a lot more food browsing&nbsp;
in hot weather than I think is typical,&nbsp;&nbsp;

196
00:16:04,320 --> 00:16:10,846
and the energy guide label for the red fridge was&nbsp;
about 20% higher than my own stress testing.

197
00:16:10,846 --> 00:16:15,643
But even if we go with the 633 kWh annual figure,

198
00:16:15,643 --> 00:16:24,948
then&nbsp;my actual fridge uses only 35 percent more energy
for approximately 7,000 percent more refrigerated&nbsp;space

199
00:16:24,948 --> 00:16:27,313
with a freezer on top of that.

200
00:16:27,313 --> 00:16:29,518
Or, below it, actually.

201
00:16:29,518 --> 00:16:36,785
So, why is this blue lump of&nbsp;sadness 
so much less efficient than any of the refrigerators we’ve discussed?

202
00:16:36,785 --> 00:16:39,609
Because all the rest have…

203
00:16:39,609 --> 00:16:41,985
heat pumps!

204
00:16:41,985 --> 00:16:48,181
Now, very out of character for me,&nbsp;
I’m going to keep my explanation of the refrigeration cycle pretty brief.

205
00:16:48,181 --> 00:16:49,130
Kind of&nbsp;brief.

206
00:16:49,130 --> 00:16:49,880
Brief-ish.

207
00:16:49,880 --> 00:16:52,650
But here’s why it’s such a big deal:

208
00:16:52,650 --> 00:16:58,878
a vapor-compression heat pump like the one we&nbsp;
find in even this very cheap and basic mini-fridge

209
00:16:58,878 --> 00:17:05,202
can move more heat energy out of the fridge's interior
than it takes to run the heat pump.

210
00:17:05,202 --> 00:17:10,757
That may sound impossible,
but the compressor is&nbsp;the only thing in here doing any work,

211
00:17:10,757 --> 00:17:18,672
and all it’s doing is using an electric motor to&nbsp;
spin some pumpy parts inside this enclosure which pressurizes a gas.

212
00:17:18,672 --> 00:17:22,395
In the case of this fridge,&nbsp;
that’s literally the only thing it’s doing.

213
00:17:22,395 --> 00:17:28,765
All the rest of its parts are just pipes and tubes&nbsp;
which are exposed to the air inside and out.

214
00:17:28,920 --> 00:17:31,744
The gas it’s compressing is called a refrigerant.

215
00:17:31,744 --> 00:17:36,089
Refrigerants are a category of gasses
that we’ve discovered (or sometimes engineered)

216
00:17:36,089 --> 00:17:41,153
that&nbsp;have really useful relationships between their pressure and their boiling point.

217
00:17:41,153 --> 00:17:47,263
This fridge,&nbsp;like most on the market today,
uses isobutane which at atmospheric pressure is a gas.

218
00:17:47,263 --> 00:17:56,284
But if&nbsp;you pressurize isobutane to about 80 PSI,
its boiling point shoots up to 110 degrees Fahrenheit.

219
00:17:56,284 --> 00:17:58,840
That’s much hotter than typical room temperatures,

220
00:17:59,360 --> 00:18:05,120
so if you feed that high pressure gas through&nbsp;
some tubes that are exposed to ambient air,&nbsp;&nbsp;

221
00:18:05,120 --> 00:18:12,794
the air will cool it down to the point&nbsp;that it can’t be a gas anymore
and it&nbsp;will spontaneously condense into a liquid.

222
00:18:12,794 --> 00:18:21,420
That&nbsp;condensing action releases a ton of heat energy because of a thing called
the latent heat of vaporization which to save time I am not getting into right now,

223
00:18:21,420 --> 00:18:25,389
but you can see this heat being released&nbsp;in the thermal camera.

224
00:18:25,389 --> 00:18:31,465
You can even make out the tubes the refrigerant is traveling through just&nbsp;below the surface of the fridge’s outer skin.

225
00:18:31,465 --> 00:18:37,560
Thanks to the pumping action of the compressor,&nbsp;
the refrigerant is actively pushed through those tubes.

226
00:18:37,560 --> 00:18:43,485
At the entrance it’s purely hot gas
(and&nbsp;it’s hot because the compressor just compressed it),

227
00:18:43,485 --> 00:18:48,869
but as it makes its way through it sheds heat&nbsp;energy and begins to liquify.

228
00:18:48,869 --> 00:18:54,629
By the time it makes it to the end of the tube,
a slug of liquid&nbsp;refrigerant will have bunched up.

229
00:18:54,629 --> 00:19:00,676
Then, that liquid refrigerant gets sent through a restriction&nbsp;
which limits the volume of fluid flow.

230
00:19:00,676 --> 00:19:07,806
Because of the restriction and the pumping action of the&nbsp;
compressor, a pressure imbalance is maintained on either side.

231
00:19:07,806 --> 00:19:14,658
And once the liquid makes it through&nbsp;it finds itself inside the evaporator
where the pressure is very low,

232
00:19:14,658 --> 00:19:22,126
in fact so low that the&nbsp;boiling point of isobutane
plummets to something like -20 degrees Fahrenheit.

233
00:19:22,126 --> 00:19:29,510
Even the air inside&nbsp;a freezer is warmer than that,
which means there’s energy available to boil the refrigerant.

234
00:19:29,510 --> 00:19:35,709
That causes it to absorb latent heat energy which means it gets very, very cold.

235
00:19:35,709 --> 00:19:44,480
Once the&nbsp;refrigerant has completely boiled away and becomes a gas once more,
it finds itself back at the&nbsp;compressor and the whole thing starts over again.

236
00:19:44,480 --> 00:19:47,390
The gas it’s compressing is called a refrigerant.

237
00:19:47,390 --> 00:19:52,311
Refrigerants are a category of gasses that we’ve discovered
(or sometimes engineered) that&nbsp;—

238
00:19:52,311 --> 00:19:53,784
okay that’s enough of that.

239
00:19:53,784 --> 00:20:01,360
Key to understanding this process is&nbsp;that the refrigerant,
through boiling away, absorbs a lot of heat energy.

240
00:20:01,360 --> 00:20:04,528
That heat energy is then&nbsp;stored in the refrigerant.

241
00:20:04,528 --> 00:20:12,064
But, when we compress it and it condenses back into a liquid,
it releases the energy it had just absorbed.

242
00:20:12,064 --> 00:20:18,885
Since we’re in control of where that happens,
we can move heat energy from&nbsp;one place to another.

243
00:20:18,885 --> 00:20:24,090
In the case of a fridge,
we’re pumping the heat out of the fridge’s interior&nbsp;which cools it down

244
00:20:24,090 --> 00:20:27,189
and then releasing that heat to the outside air.

245
00:20:27,189 --> 00:20:33,685
And the only thing we’re doing&nbsp;to make that happen
is compress a gas and pushing it through some pipes.

246
00:20:33,685 --> 00:20:37,679
The refrigerant does the&nbsp;heat transfer stuff all on its own.

247
00:20:37,679 --> 00:20:45,087
That is how a vapor-compression heat pump is able to move&nbsp;
more energy than the machine itself consumes.

248
00:20:45,087 --> 00:20:52,174
The heat moving capacity compared to its power&nbsp;draw
is a metric known as the coefficient of performance.

249
00:20:52,174 --> 00:20:55,827
Now, not many people calculate the COP&nbsp;of a fridge,

250
00:20:55,827 --> 00:21:04,106
but if I assume it has a COP of 3
then we get a threefold increase in cooling&nbsp;power compared to input power.

251
00:21:04,106 --> 00:21:13,857
In other words, the 45 watts of power this fridge pulls from&nbsp;the wall when it’s running
generates 135 watts of cooling power in the evaporator.

252
00:21:13,857 --> 00:21:17,979
That is why&nbsp;we bother with a compressor and all this piping and junk,

253
00:21:17,979 --> 00:21:20,942
it’s just really, really efficient.

254
00:21:20,942 --> 00:21:25,784
And that’s also why heat pumps for heating our homes are becoming such a big deal:

255
00:21:25,784 --> 00:21:31,243
just as&nbsp;there’s heat to be pulled out of a freezer,
there’s heat to be grabbed from the air outside.

256
00:21:31,243 --> 00:21:40,134
And so long as the COP of an operating heat pump is over 1,
we're getting some free heat compared to running an electric heating&nbsp;element.

257
00:21:40,134 --> 00:21:42,609
But anyway, this video isn't about that.

258
00:21:42,609 --> 00:21:48,984
Peltier elements, because they move heat from one&nbsp;side to the other, 
are technically heat pumps.

259
00:21:48,984 --> 00:21:52,532
And that means we can measure their coefficient&nbsp;of performance.

260
00:21:52,532 --> 00:22:01,883
But that’s tricky to do because unlike a vapor-compression heat pump, their&nbsp;efficiency will vary wildly depending on the temperature difference it’s fighting

261
00:22:01,883 --> 00:22:05,198
as well&nbsp;as how much current you’re shoving through it.

262
00:22:05,198 --> 00:22:07,754
Remember, this is really thin.

263
00:22:07,754 --> 00:22:13,227
And the materials&nbsp;used to construct this
conduct heat even when it’s not running at all,

264
00:22:13,227 --> 00:22:17,016
so the higher the temperature&nbsp;difference between the hot and cold sides,

265
00:22:17,016 --> 00:22:23,428
the more heat energy leaks through the element itself
and the less efficient it becomes.

266
00:22:23,428 --> 00:22:25,439
And the effect there is dramatic.

267
00:22:25,439 --> 00:22:33,743
On top of that, the more current&nbsp;you try to push through this,
the more heat it generates inside itself which also makes things&nbsp;worse.

268
00:22:33,743 --> 00:22:41,956
In theory, if everything is perfect and you can run these at very low current,
you can get a&nbsp;COP between 1 and 2.

269
00:22:41,956 --> 00:22:50,964
But that will hardly generate any cooling at all, so in practice,
the COP of&nbsp;a device using a Peltier element for cooling

270
00:22:50,964 --> 00:22:54,384
is somewhere between zero and very bad.

271
00:22:54,384 --> 00:23:01,326
And that’s&nbsp;why this stupid little blue fridge
is using so much more energy than this actual fridge.

272
00:23:01,326 --> 00:23:02,813
Or that&nbsp;actual fridge.

273
00:23:03,078 --> 00:23:05,259
Or THAT actual fridge.

274
00:23:05,259 --> 00:23:08,686
Now, in fairness, there is more going on here.

275
00:23:08,686 --> 00:23:14,435
Its reliance on the Peltier effect is of course
the major factor in this fridge’s terrible efficiency,

276
00:23:14,435 --> 00:23:17,295
but it’s also got a lot to do with its design.

277
00:23:17,295 --> 00:23:25,486
Any actual fridge is subject to regulations&nbsp;
which mean it has to have enough insulation in its walls to pass performance tests.

278
00:23:25,486 --> 00:23:32,299
The blue&nbsp;toy is a toy, and honestly I could barely even detect any insulation at all!

279
00:23:32,299 --> 00:23:34,586
The walls all feel&nbsp;hollow.

280
00:23:34,586 --> 00:23:42,013
So I drilled some exploratory holes and determined
that it does have what appears&nbsp;to be Styrofoam in the side walls

281
00:23:42,013 --> 00:23:44,920
but the door is in fact hollow.

282
00:23:44,920 --> 00:23:46,438
That’s great.

283
00:23:46,438 --> 00:23:55,120
If this&nbsp;had more insulation it could probably get its insides cooler using less energy,
but it&nbsp;would then also need some sort of temperature control.

284
00:23:55,120 --> 00:24:00,134
I think it’s actually relying on heat intrusion&nbsp;
through the door to keep things from freezing.

285
00:24:00,134 --> 00:24:02,970
But any time you’re using a Peltier element,

286
00:24:02,970 --> 00:24:11,763
even the best designs with lots of thermal insulation are going to
run into the fundamental problem of a&nbsp;terrible coefficient of performance.

287
00:24:11,763 --> 00:24:19,143
These are just not very good at what they’re supposed to do
and will always&nbsp;lose a fight with a grown-up heat pump.

288
00:24:19,143 --> 00:24:24,134
And, not for nothing, while people fixate on&nbsp;the harm refrigerants cause

289
00:24:24,134 --> 00:24:30,167
(because they have been truly awful to the environment
and many in use today&nbsp;still are in one way or another)

290
00:24:30,167 --> 00:24:33,752
isobutane is not really a problem at all.

291
00:24:33,752 --> 00:24:39,147
It’s flammable&nbsp;which presents some practical challenges,
especially when the systems require service,

292
00:24:39,147 --> 00:24:45,660
but it has a global warming potential of only 3.3
and its other environmental effects&nbsp;are negligible.

293
00:24:45,660 --> 00:24:48,111
Plus, there’s hardly any of it in a fridge.

294
00:24:48,111 --> 00:24:52,514
Even my big one at home has&nbsp;a refrigerant charge of just 55 grams.

295
00:24:52,514 --> 00:24:58,354
So when it comes to domestic refrigerators,
you honestly don’t need to be worried about that anymore.

296
00:24:58,440 --> 00:25:06,235
You may remember, though, that I did say Peltier&nbsp;elements
have some very specific advantages&nbsp;in very specific applications.

297
00:25:06,235 --> 00:25:12,195
I’ve already&nbsp;covered the main one - if you need some cooling as cheaply as possible, they are&nbsp;an option.

298
00:25:12,195 --> 00:25:18,157
You just have to be aware of how energy-intensive they are
and decide&nbsp;whether that trade-off is worth it.

299
00:25:18,157 --> 00:25:20,558
And sometimes it might be!

300
00:25:20,558 --> 00:25:28,181
If, for example,&nbsp;you’re only using something occasionally,
the poor efficiency of these things might not matter that&nbsp;much.

301
00:25:28,181 --> 00:25:32,361
One example would be a portable cooler you can bring with you in the car.

302
00:25:32,361 --> 00:25:38,885
If it’s only&nbsp;ever going to be used on occasional car rides,
and it’s got the energy source of a car to&nbsp;supply it,

303
00:25:38,885 --> 00:25:41,696
its energy efficiency isn’t that critical.

304
00:25:41,696 --> 00:25:46,058
And portability is another area where Peltier&nbsp;elements can shine.

305
00:25:46,058 --> 00:25:51,854
The elements themselves weigh almost nothing,
and even finished products&nbsp;are quite light.

306
00:25:51,854 --> 00:25:57,850
This little thing doesn’t even weigh 4 pounds
(it’s 1.68 kilograms to be precise in metric fashion).

307
00:25:57,850 --> 00:26:03,069
Meanwhile the mini-fridge,
despite having the most adorable little compressor&nbsp;I’ve ever seen,

308
00:26:03,069 --> 00:26:07,505
weighs a much heftier 33 pounds (15 kilograms).

309
00:26:07,505 --> 00:26:14,668
In fairness the bulk of its weight&nbsp;isn’t from the refrigeration circuit,
just the metal parts that make up its body and frame and&nbsp;the door,

310
00:26:14,668 --> 00:26:17,099
but it’s still a pretty huge difference.

311
00:26:17,099 --> 00:26:22,411
And when it comes to portability,&nbsp;
vapor-compression based systems have an Achille's heel:

312
00:26:22,411 --> 00:26:25,229
they are orientation-sensitive.

313
00:26:25,229 --> 00:26:32,929
The compressor that’s inside this little black ball is made of metal parts
which rub&nbsp;against each other and thus need lubrication,

314
00:26:33,000 --> 00:26:40,124
and to provide that lubrication (and also cooling
for the windings of the electric motor) the system&nbsp;has oil in it.

315
00:26:40,124 --> 00:26:47,208
The compressor housing forms&nbsp;an oil sump,
and we rely on gravity to keep that oil pooled in the bottom of the sump

316
00:26:47,208 --> 00:26:51,497
so that the&nbsp;compressor has the lubrication and cooling that it requires.

317
00:26:51,497 --> 00:27:00,911
And Earth’s gravity, famously, only&nbsp;ever pulls things towards the center of the Earth,
so you have to have this upright for it&nbsp;to work without destroying itself.

318
00:27:01,382 --> 00:27:09,286
And, if you move anything with a refrigeration&nbsp;compressor in it 
and you aren’t 100% sure&nbsp;it stayed upright as you moved it,

319
00:27:09,286 --> 00:27:18,171
you need to&nbsp;let these sit upright for at least a few hours before you switch them on
so any oil that&nbsp;might have gone somewhere it shouldn’t can&nbsp;drain back to the sump

320
00:27:18,171 --> 00:27:23,397
(many manufacturers&nbsp;will tell you to wait a full 24 hours
before switching them on after they've been moved).

321
00:27:24,040 --> 00:27:29,064
Peltier elements,
because they don't have any&nbsp;mechanical parts, don’t care about that!

322
00:27:29,064 --> 00:27:31,655
You can operate this fridge however you like,

323
00:27:31,655 --> 00:27:34,910
though&nbsp;of course you need to make sure the cooling vents aren’t blocked,

324
00:27:34,910 --> 00:27:37,477
and you'll never have to wait&nbsp;to switch it on after you move it.

325
00:27:37,477 --> 00:27:38,785
It’s always ready.

326
00:27:38,785 --> 00:27:43,150
And Peltier elements also have one last trick up their&nbsp;sleeves:

327
00:27:43,150 --> 00:27:47,939
when you reverse the polarity, they move heat in the opposite direction!

328
00:27:47,939 --> 00:27:52,762
That&nbsp;means you can offer a device which both heats and cools quite trivially.

329
00:27:52,762 --> 00:27:58,502
In fact, heated and cooled&nbsp;cupholders in cars is one application for this in real life.

330
00:27:58,668 --> 00:28:03,177
You can bond a Peltier element to a thermally conductive&nbsp;
ring surrounding a cup holder

331
00:28:03,177 --> 00:28:06,439
(and use some sort of heat spreader for the other side of the&nbsp;element)

332
00:28:06,439 --> 00:28:11,856
and you can keep hot drinks hot or cold drinks cold just by flipping a switch.

333
00:28:11,856 --> 00:28:15,832
But, in all honesty, that’s mostly a gimmick.

334
00:28:15,832 --> 00:28:21,405
I saw it at the auto show when I was maybe 12&nbsp;
and it hasn’t taken the world by storm yet.

335
00:28:21,405 --> 00:28:23,337
But back to the present.

336
00:28:23,337 --> 00:28:30,471
When the design&nbsp;requirements of very cheap to build,
easily portable, and only occasional use all collide,

337
00:28:30,471 --> 00:28:34,731
using Peltier&nbsp;elements for cooling makes some sense.

338
00:28:34,731 --> 00:28:44,177
But if this is going into something that’s going to be in anything&nbsp;close to continuous use and energy efficiency matters either for cost or scarcity reasons,

339
00:28:44,177 --> 00:28:46,792
it just doesn’t make any sense at all.

340
00:28:46,792 --> 00:28:52,424
There is in fact a very good reason refrigeration&nbsp;
is still happening the way it always has.

341
00:28:52,424 --> 00:28:57,174
And if you’re looking at a product like this and&nbsp;thinking that might be useful,

342
00:28:57,174 --> 00:29:03,696
I would highly suggest you think long and hard about
whether one&nbsp;of these cube fridges might fit your needs.

343
00:29:03,696 --> 00:29:11,748
No, they’re not going to fit on your desk (at least not easily)
but they’ll&nbsp;do a lot more for you using a lot less energy.

344
00:29:11,748 --> 00:29:16,428
And these, too, can be had in all sorts of&nbsp;
goofy colors if you look in the right places.

345
00:29:16,428 --> 00:29:23,033
That said… I would be remiss if I didn’t mention&nbsp;
the big downside to some of these, including this model:

346
00:29:23,033 --> 00:29:28,994
ice builds up on the evaporator over time
and so this needs occasional defrosting.

347
00:29:28,994 --> 00:29:34,431
Depending on what you’re using it for that might be very&nbsp;rare
but it’s something to keep in mind.

348
00:29:34,431 --> 00:29:41,699
However, there are also plenty of these out there&nbsp;which have 
rear-mounted, vertical evaporators and skip the freezer compartment entirely,

349
00:29:41,699 --> 00:29:44,021
and those don’t need defrosting.

350
00:29:44,021 --> 00:29:47,944
I would honestly seek one of those out if you’re looking for&nbsp;a mini-fridge like this.

351
00:29:47,944 --> 00:29:52,602
Honestly the freezer compartment in here is pretty useless and just eats up space.

352
00:29:52,602 --> 00:29:55,780
The only reason I grabbed this one was because it was on sale at Menards.

353
00:29:55,780 --> 00:29:59,571
Only&nbsp;$80 and you know I mailed in that 11% rebate!

354
00:29:59,571 --> 00:30:04,905
And speaking of cheap things from Menards,&nbsp;
I should say this particular model has a few annoyances.

355
00:30:04,905 --> 00:30:08,984
Its compressor is oddly buzzy,&nbsp;which is disappointing.

356
00:30:08,984 --> 00:30:15,740
The red fridge is actually quieter than the thermoelectric fridge, 
but this&nbsp;baby fridge is louder.

357
00:30:15,740 --> 00:30:20,674
There’s a good chance I just drew the short straw there
and most of these&nbsp;have quieter compressors,

358
00:30:20,674 --> 00:30:24,116
and besides I don’t think it would really be very annoying under a desk.

359
00:30:24,116 --> 00:30:26,364
But…&nbsp;something to mention.

360
00:30:26,364 --> 00:30:33,583
What actually worries me about this model is the fact that the thermostat
runs very, very short cycles.

361
00:30:33,583 --> 00:30:39,577
Like, once it’s down to temp it runs for 2 or 3 minutes and then stops&nbsp;for 3 or 4.

362
00:30:39,577 --> 00:30:43,293
That’s usually not the healthiest thing for a refrigeration compressor.

363
00:30:43,293 --> 00:30:48,494
But in this&nbsp;case, because of the design here,
I actually think that’s on purpose.

364
00:30:48,494 --> 00:30:54,439
Since the interior is so tiny,&nbsp;
you’re going to end up with stuff right against the evaporator,

365
00:30:54,439 --> 00:31:00,343
so if it were to run for too long at once&nbsp;
it would likely freeze some stuff on the top shelf.

366
00:31:00,343 --> 00:31:04,902
But anyway, now we’re just shopping for&nbsp;mini-fridges so I think I should wrap it up.

367
00:31:04,902 --> 00:31:13,105
The bottom line of this video is that Peltier elements are interesting and cool devices 
but they're just not good for general purpose cooling.

368
00:31:13,105 --> 00:31:18,312
And since we’ve adopted isobutane as the standard&nbsp;
refrigerant in domestic refrigerators,

369
00:31:18,312 --> 00:31:22,808
to be honest you can stop feeling guilty about&nbsp;bringing another fridge into the world.

370
00:31:22,808 --> 00:31:26,355
I mean, you probably shouldn't buy one unless you&nbsp;actually need it

371
00:31:26,355 --> 00:31:32,944
(and I’m 50/50 on whether I’m gonna keep this for storing my color film
or donate it so someone else can make better use of it).

372
00:31:32,944 --> 00:31:38,262
But really this is just a cooler&nbsp;which happens to have a little heat pump in it.

373
00:31:38,262 --> 00:31:41,907
The steel and copper in here is the only&nbsp;special sauce.

374
00:31:41,907 --> 00:31:44,467
Ooh, I could keep sauce in here!

375
00:31:45,232 --> 00:31:47,798
♫ inefficiently smooth jazz ♫

376
00:31:49,476 --> 00:31:53,132
It may look like the teleprompter hasn’t started but that’s cuz it hasn’t.

377
00:31:53,132 --> 00:31:56,740
Which to us feels like coldness, and reject ahh..

378
00:31:56,740 --> 00:31:57,240
[clears throat]

379
00:31:57,240 --> 00:31:58,896
ehbutehbuDEDABAH

380
00:31:58,896 --> 00:32:02,056
Because all the rest have…

381
00:32:02,056 --> 00:32:04,061
HEAT PUUUuuUuuUUUumps.

382
00:32:04,061 --> 00:32:05,436
Woah that was not good.

383
00:32:05,436 --> 00:32:07,801
Even if we go with the 633

384
00:32:07,801 --> 00:32:09,616
kilowattanggguhbuhdeblledyaghbleurf

385
00:32:09,616 --> 00:32:11,578
Even when it's not running at all.

386
00:32:11,578 --> 00:32:16,021
So the higher temperature difference between the cot and…

387
00:32:16,021 --> 00:32:16,933
dah.

388
00:32:16,933 --> 00:32:21,639
..american energyguide label is very very pessimistic thanks to the way the depart oh…

389
00:32:21,639 --> 00:32:24,031
debeduh debeduh debbity duh

390
00:32:24,031 --> 00:32:28,074
It’s flammable which presents some practical challenges especially when

391
00:32:28,074 --> 00:32:32,373
ssssssssssssssssshhhwhww

392
00:32:32,373 --> 00:32:33,291
welp.

393
00:32:34,881 --> 00:32:36,610
So I think we can sum this up pretty well:

394
00:32:36,610 --> 00:32:38,423
Peltier elements? Not cool.

395
00:32:38,423 --> 00:32:40,649
Oh except they are... on the one side.

396
00:32:40,649 --> 00:32:42,632
But not cool as in, like, good.

397
00:32:42,632 --> 00:32:44,228
Or hip.

398
00:32:44,228 --> 00:32:47,024
Or rizz. Is that what the kids say now?

399
00:32:47,024 --> 00:32:49,214
oh no I looked it up and that is NOT RIGHT

400
00:32:49,214 --> 00:32:52,335
skibidi heat pump

